Saumaize-Michelin is a top-flight small biodynamic grower-vigneron who is making some beautiful wines from his cellar in Vergisson. Pouilly-Fuisse, unlike the appellations such as Chassagne and Meursault, is not centered around a single village, but rather four separate villages, Vergisson and Fuisse being the most renown. Vergisson sits in a valley below the massive limestone monolith of La Roche de Vergisson, and some of its vineyards climb up and around the backside of this behemoth. Vergisson, the northern-most village, is the coolest in the appellations, and because of that, it is reputed to have the highest levels of acidity. In 2011, I would not have been so sure, but with these 2012s, the acidity and concentration of these wines (particularly with the Macon) are jaw dropping.
Click on any photo to enlarge.
2012 Pouilly-Fuisse “Vignes Blanches”
While the 2011s were a bit fat in Maconnaise, this, the first of the 2012 Pouilly to be shipped from Saumaize is sensational in zingingly crisp acidity, with lots of chalky minerals in the nose and the palate: round river stones, apple, lime peel, some nice weight, and modest viscosity. The wine is long and fresh, there is also a waft of balsa and mahogany sawdust. While there are many inexpensive Pouilly-Fuisses on the marketplace, this is definitely not one of those. This is a big step up in quality and verve, and it should improve as it puts on weight and gras with a couple years of age. A fantastic Chardonnay that is comparable in style and quality with a fine St-Aubin. This is drawn from several of his Pouilly-Fuisse Vineyards around Vergisson. $32.00 92 points
2012 Macon-Vergisson “La Roche”
Everything about this wine is intense, including its nose of cooked cream, lemon, lime peel and butterscotch. In the mouth there is ripping acidity, etching and intense in its attack, pushing the wines concentrated size and weight to their limit to hold this all together. This is a very powerful wine, that has both ripeness and fresh lemon and lots of lime peel flavors, some interesting twig/stem-like flavors, and finally, it gains some breadth in the back of the mouth, with fresh, yeasty bread dough flavors, and finishing with frothy cream, and toasty notes. Impressive for its concentration and fierce attack, but it is almost difficult to drink.
“Roger Saumaize is swinging for the fences with this daring attempt to totally re-write what Macon village-level wine can be.”
I fear this will turn to all lemon curd as it matures, but I’d like to see this mellow just a bit. For now, it really wants to be paired with some fatty food to tame it a bit. Wow. That’s a mouthful. It is difficult to judge at this stage. Will it come into balance? Time will tell. If it can broaden out and sufficiently cover the fierce acidity, this could be a 91 or 92 point wine. But if the lemon flavors overwhelm the other fruit as it matures, this will ultimately fail for me, getting a low 80s score. Either way, Roger Saumaize is swinging for the fences with this daring attempt to totally re-write what Macon-Village level wine can be.
This Macon-Vergisson vineyard had a particularly small crop, and we got half of the wine we received in 2011. Only 10 cases were imported.
Vergisson has various soil types, and Saumaize’s vineyards various vineyards represent this.
Ronchevats sits in deep, younger, Triassic era soils of non-calcareous clay, meaning there is no limestone present, although there is a significant amount of magnesium present.
The Les Crays vineyard, at the foot of La Roche de Vergisson, as well as Courtelongs to the south of town has soils that are made up of white Marl (a mix of clay and decomposed limestone) with a high percentage of limestone in the mix.
The top of Sur La Roche vineyard has shallow soils with Crinoidal Limestone (limestone full of Crinoidal fossils) from the Bajocian era limestone from the middle Jurassic 170 million years ago to 168 million years ago. This period is associated with the development of ammonite biozones While lower on the hill has shallow soil over limestone from the Bathonian stage 168 million years ago to 166 million years ago. It is interesting to note that the older limestone sits above the younger limestone on the slope. What major upheaval of the earth resulted in that?
Thanks for this article. May I ask a question? Regarding the terroirs in Pouilly fussie, is it the same as those in Chablis? how are chablis wine style compared to a pouilly fussie?
LikeLike
Hi PK,
While I am not an expert of the terroirs of either region, I can tell you a few things I do (believe that) I know, without actually taking the time to research it. First, the two regions are quite a distance apart (218km). Pouilly-Fuisse is pretty far south of Chassagne, the southern-most village of the Cote d’Or, and relatively near the city of Macon. I cannot speak of three of the villages of Pouilly, but we do represent a Saumaize-Michelin in Vergisson, and the one soil map that I have looked over, indicates a wide variety of soil types and exposures. The Sur la Roche, the monolith that dominates the village is limestone, so the vineyards on its slopes are marl. But in the areas surrounding the Roche, the rolling hills tend to be clay, and or sand dominant. These produce very different wines, (as a generalization these tend more weighty and tropical in their fruits) than those made from la Roche. The vineyards are often not planted oriented to the east as in the rest of Burgundy, so the multiple orientations can greatly affect the ripeness and thus character of the wine grown in each vineyard.
Chablis on-the-other-hand is quite a distance northwest of Marsannay, the Cote d’Or’s northernmost village. It lies 138km from Dijon near the town of Auxerre, north of the Morvan mountains. I have studied this area even less than Pouilly-Fuisse. But much is made of the “Kimmeridgian soils” should be discarded as useful information. Kimmeridgian is a geological time period, and not actually indicative of any soil type. However, the “Kimmeridgian soils” are reputed to be Limestone, clay, heavily influenced by oyster fossils. While I’m not sure that fossils impart any character themselves, their existence indicates that the limestone is weaker where it intersects with fossils, and the limestone will tend to fracture along these impurities. What this means is normal earth pressures stress the limestone, it is far more easily fractured in these locations. This allows not only allows the vines to penetrate the limestone but for water to drain and collect in the fractured stone, as an aquifer. Although much of Chablis AC is planted, that it is proven that the best vineyards of Chablis are on the east-facing slopes, certainly indicates that it is likely colder there than typically the vineyards in Pouilly are, where we see a more uniform ripening on a wider variety of slopes. But then again, I’m not talking from any studies of temperatures coupled with actual vineyard sites, rather just a quick, off-the-cuff observation. So don’t quote me on this!
LikeLike